OTTAWA -- Itā€™s possible that China could look to detain other Canadians as a result of this weekā€™s court ruling that did not go in Huawei executive Meng Wanzhouā€™s favour, says a former head of Canadaā€™s spy agency.

In an interview on CTVā€™s Question Period, former CSIS director Richard Fadden said that ā€œthe easiestā€ form of Chinese retaliation to picture would be that other Canadians who are in that country are ā€œat some risk that they may join the two Michaels in Chinese detention.ā€

Responding to whether or not Canadians in China should be concerned about this possibility, Foreign Affairs Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne didnā€™t indicate any change in messaging to Canadians currently in that country, telling host Evan Solomon that he thinks Canadians living in China have taken notice of the frayed diplomatic tensions.

On Wednesday a British Columbia judge ruled that the alleged fraud Meng is accused of committing by U.S. authorities, would be considered a crime in Canada. This means that Meng will not be free to leave Canada, as her lawyers pushed for, and will remain under house arrest as proceedings continue. 

The case against Meng has had deep political consequences for Canada-China relations. Just days days after Mengā€™s arrest in 2018, Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor were detained in China and accused of crimes related to national security.

Their detention has been widely seen as a form of retaliation from China, which also included kicking off a trade war, putting Canadian farmers in Chinaā€™s crosshairs.

ā€œMy words to my counterpart [whom] I've reached out, is to say, we should exercise restraint. This is not a time to escalate anythingā€¦ We have our differences, we know them,ā€ Champagne said, adding that Canada will continue to advocate for the two Michaels to be released.

ā€œThere's quite a difference between the Meng caseā€” of someone who was arrested under an international treaty of extradition, which is afforded due process in a country which believes in the rule of lawā€”compared to two Canadians who have been arbitrary detainedā€¦ for more than 500 days, thatā€™s 500 days too much,ā€ he said.

'THEY WILL RETALIATE'

The courtā€™s decision this week has prompted many foreign policy experts to predict that it would be only a matter of time before China retaliated.

Fadden, who has also served as the top national security adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his predecessor Stephen Harper, said it wonā€™t take long for them to ā€œcome afterā€ Canada.

ā€œI think they will retaliateā€¦ They're going to retaliate not only to send us a message but also to send a message to other countriesā€¦ So yes I think there will be further economic consequences, but I think they will probably augment their efforts, trying to undermine us both domestically and internationally through a variety of means,ā€ Fadden said.

Other possible avenues for retaliation Fadden cited included attempting to meddle in Canadaā€™s bid for a seat on the UN Security Council; and using its relationships with other nations as well as social media to spread misinformation about Canada

ā€œThere's a fair bit that they can do just by spreading false information about us and doing this in large chunks of the world where people don't have full access to all sorts of information, they can really do a great deal of harm to Canada's reputation,ā€ he said.

During the same panel conversation, former Canadian ambassador to China Guy Saint-Jacques suggested that Canada do two things in short order: ā€œFirst to impress on the Americans that they have to do more to help us,ā€ and then to seek support from like-minded countries to come onside and be ready to deplore any future retaliatory efforts.

With files from Ā鶹“«Ć½ā€™ Graham Slaughter