Just after Canadian officials met with one of the men detained in China on espionage charges, a close observer says the country鈥檚 pressure campaign against Canada may be backfiring.
On Monday, consular officials met with International Crisis Group analyst Michael Kovrig for the eighth time since he was detained in December along with Canadian consultant Michael Spavor.
Canada asserts that the arrests were arbitrary, and experts say they were nothing more than retaliation for the Dec. 1 arrest of Chinese telecom executive Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver on behalf of the United States.
China said just after Meng鈥檚 arrest that Canada would pay 鈥渁 heavy price鈥� if it did not release the Huawei CFO. The arrests were followed by a Chinese ban on Canadian canola exports and some meats, which China says is due to food safety concerns but experts say is further retaliation.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has held firm that Canada鈥檚 government will respect the rule of law. He convinced U.S. President Donald Trump to raise the issues of the detainees with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20 meeting last weekend in Japan.
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer called last week for Trudeau to take a harder stance, ramping up inspections on Chinese goods and to possibly impose sanctions.
Scott McKnight, managing editor of China Open Research Network, tells 麻豆传媒 Channel that Scheer鈥檚 comments show 鈥渢he Chinese systematic pressure strategy may have backfired.鈥�
That strategy, he says, was to cause Canada enough pain that Trudeau would either release Meng or be forced 鈥渙ut of power altogether,鈥� allowing for a reset of the relationship under the Conservatives.
鈥淲ith Mr. Scheer talking about escalating tensions and retaliating against China, this is not what the Chinese were looking for,鈥� he said.
However, McKnight said tariffs might be a risky strategy, considering the size of the Chinese economy and military.
鈥淭he reality is Canada is in a much more difficult position than China is on this question,鈥� he said.
Little is known about Monday鈥檚 meeting with Kovrig but McKnight points out that it鈥檚 the first since Chinese officials took away Kovrig鈥檚 reading glasses.
鈥淲hy would they do something frankly as petty and trivial as that?鈥� he said. 鈥淚t seems now that Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor are both unfortunately now being subjected to this long, gradual yet somewhat subtle process of mental suffering and anguish that the Chinese authorities are inflicting them, ultimately with the goal of a confession from one of the two on espionage,鈥� he explained.
鈥淯nfortunately, this type of forced confession is very common in the Chinese judicial system,鈥� he added.
