A jury has found two men accused in an alleged plot to derail a Via passenger train guilty on eight of nine terror-related charges.
Both Chiheb Esseghaier and Raed Jaser were found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder for the benefit of or in association with a terror group. Jaser was found guilty on two counts and Esseghaier on three counts of participating in or contributing to the activity of a terror group.
Esseghaier was also found guilty of conspiring to damage transportation property with intent to danger safety for the benefit of or in association with a terror group. The jury could not reach a consensus on the same charge for Jaser, and so the presiding judge declared a mistrial on that count.
The jury arrived at its verdict after 10 days of deliberations. Jurors returned to court six times to ask questions.
Earlier in the day, the jury had said they were deadlocked on one charge.
Presiding Justice Michael Code told them that he could accept unanimous verdicts on the eight other charges and discharge the ninth.
After they delivered their verdict, Code thanked jurors for their âfocused, diligent and conscientious workâ during the trial. They then filed out of the courtroom.
Outside court, prosecutor Croft Michaelson thanked the jurors for devoting âso much time and effortâ to hearing the case, and U.S. authorities that helped with the investigation.
In particular, he hailed the efforts of an undercover FBI agent who infiltrated the plot.
âThe case turned on his investigative efforts,â
He described the two accused as âreally serious public dangers.â
Michaelson said he would decide in the coming weeks whether to retry Jaser on the one discharged count, but also said he was happy with the eight convictions.
The jury clearly believed Jaser had agreed to commit murder, but some were obviously not sure that he had agreed to derail a train, Michaelson said.
Jaser and Esseghaier were arrested in 2013 following an extensive investigation into the alleged plot target a Via passenger train as it travelled between Canada and the United States.
Jaser's defence team said their client did not have criminal intentions, and faked his interest in the plot in order to get money from Esseghaier and another man who was, in fact, an undercover FBI agent.
Esseghaier did not participate in the trial on the grounds that he wanted to be judged according to the tenets of the Qurâan. He did not stand in court as the verdicts were read.
On Wednesday, the jury said it had reached a verdict for one of the two men, but were unable to reach a consensus on all charges against the other.
They were sent back to continue their deliberations.
his client is âdisappointed with the ultimate outcomeâ of the trial, but said the jury did âexceptional work.â
To a question about the juryâs inability to reach a verdict on one count against his client, Norris said âthey clearly struggled with reaching verdicts. In todayâs political climate, that couldnât have been easy.â
Justice Minister Peter MacKay wouldnât comment directly on the verdicts Friday, citing the possibility that an appeal could be filed, but he said that the trial was âindicative of the complexity of a case of this nature involving terrorism.â
âIt highlights something that is undeniable thatâs happening in our country and that isâŚthis is a very real threat,â he told CTVâs Power Play. âThis is not something theoretical or mythical, created by the government or the media.â
Esseghaier and Jaser will next appear in court on April 10.