Is James Franco a creep, or a brilliant movie marketer?

Thatā€™s what fans of the Hollywood heartthrob are wondering, after a Scottish teen leaked messages she says she exchanged earlier this week with the star of ā€œFreaks and Geeks,ā€ ā€œ127 Hoursā€ and a very ill-advised turn as host of an Oscars.

According to the story, the girl named Lucy took a video of Franco outside the stage door of the Broadway theatre where heā€™s starring in ā€œOf Mice and Men.ā€ He noticed, told her to tag him, and then tracked her down on Instagram.

The two then started direct-messaging one another. The messages appear to begin innocently enough, with Franco asking her where sheā€™s from and how long sheā€™s in New York.

It then got weird when he asked her, ā€œYouā€™re 18?ā€

She was not, she revealed; she was merely ā€œnearly 18.ā€ But the flirting continued, with the 35-year-old Franco asking her whether she had a boyfriend, where she was staying and whether he should rent them a room.

When she appeared incredulous that she was messaging the real James Franco, he sent her selfies to show her it was him.

She didnā€™t take the actor up on the offer but instead ignored his request of ā€œDonā€™t tell,ā€ and posted images of the whole exchange on Imgur. (All the images have since been removed.)

As news of the exchange travelled through Twitter and the rest of the Internet, many opined that Franco had gone from a charming, interesting actor to a creep and a pervert overnight.

The actor to the blowback on Twitter Wednesday afternoon, tweeting, "Iā€™M NOT! I HOPE PARENTS KEEP THEIR TEENS AWAY FROM ME. Thank you."

But is the whole thing a hoax?

It just so happens that Franco has a movie coming out shortly called ā€œPalo Altoā€ in which he plays an adult soccer coach having an affair with a teenager, played by Emma Roberts. So could the whole Instagram scandal be an elaborate ruse to drum up attention for the film?

Some think so.

Franco is known as a fan of performance art and has written long think-pieces for The New York Times about modern life. Heā€™s mused on the meaning of the selfie, and offered his endorsement of Shia LaBeoufā€™s decision to wear a paper bag on his head to apologize for a plagiarism scandal.

Of that he wrote: ā€œParticipating in this call and response is a kind of critique, a way to show up the media by allowing their oversize responses to essentially trivial actions to reveal the emptiness of their raison dā€™être.ā€

Hillary Busis, a writer with Entertainment Weekly, wrote Thursday that the Instagram incident-that-may or-not-be-a-scandal ā€œis just the sort of thing weā€™ve come to expect from Hollywoodā€™s most irrepressible meta-artist.

ā€œPlus, someone as plugged-in as Franco is couldnā€™t possibly think heā€™d get away with propositioning a teenage stranger, right?ā€ she wrote.

Katy Waldman over at Slate says she sincerely hopes itā€™s not a hoax, because sheā€™s frankly tired of these stunts.

ā€œIf Francoā€™s Instagram flirtation is performance, it is deeply, deeply tired. Can celebrities ever really achieve authenticity? Is all the world a stage?ā€ she wondered.

On Friday, Franco obliquely discussed the incident during an appearance on ā€œLive With Kelly and Michael,ā€ saying heā€™d been feeling awkward about finding himself in the news this week.

"I'm guess, you know, Iā€™m embarrassed, and I guess I'm just a model of how social media is tricky. Itā€™s a way people meet each other today," the actor said.

He said he used "bad judgment" and had learned his lesson.

"Unfortunately, in my positionā€¦ not only do I have to go through the embarrassing rituals of meeting someone, but sometimes if I do that, it gets published for the world. So then itā€™s doubly embarrassing."

So was that an admission the whole thing was real? Or was it more of the performance and simply Chapter 2 of the great ruse?