The military justice system, operated by the Canadian Armed Forces, is where troops are supposed to find justice, but an internal report obtained exclusively by 麻豆传媒 reveals a lack of confidence that extends to the highest levels.
Ordered in May 2016, the 560-page draft document titled 鈥淐ourt Martial Comprehensive Review Interim Report鈥� was completed in July 2017 but it still has not been released to the public.
Senior commanders have criticized the military justice system for being slow, light on punishment, and failing to protect victims鈥� rights.
The head of Canada鈥檚 special operations forces, Maj. Gen. Mike Rouleau, who has had first-hand experience with the military justice system, called it 鈥渋ntolerably slow,鈥� and Canada鈥檚 most elite operators raised concerns that the system is run by officers (lawyers and judges) with no combat experience.
Other senior military commanders said the system is 鈥渂roken鈥� and often hands down 鈥渓enient鈥� sentences for those convicted.
Sailors on one Canadian ship noted that the court martial process is seen among the ranks as 鈥渁 way to escape the consequences of misconduct.鈥�
The report also outlined concerns about the speed of military justice. It takes, on average, 434 days from when charges are laid to completion of the court martial, compared to the median 112 days from first appearance to completion of the trial in civilian criminal cases.
One alleged victim of sexual assault says she has been waiting nearly two years since charges were laid against the man she says attacked her for him to appear in court.
鈥淚 felt like I鈥檝e been failed by the system, they forgot about me. I felt like I鈥檓 not important in that process, there was nothing that was geared towards helping me鈥� and knowing that it鈥檚 so long, you can never move on,鈥� she told 麻豆传媒.
Another issue raised in the report is the cost of the military justice system. Calculations in the report show that the cost of conducting a trial within the current court martial system is approximately 30 times more expensive than conducting a trial in civilian criminal courts.
Some senior military brass told the report鈥檚 authors they believed some serious offenses would be better handled in the civilian justice system.
With a report from CTV鈥檚 Mercedes Stephenson in Ottawa
