麻豆传媒

Skip to main content

Fact check: Trump falsely claims Democratic states are passing laws allowing people to execute babies after birth

Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally on June 6, 2024, in Phoenix (Rick Scuteri / AP Photo) Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally on June 6, 2024, in Phoenix (Rick Scuteri / AP Photo)
Share
WASHINGTON -

Former President Donald Trump continues to try to depict Democrats as the 鈥溾 on abortion policy. To make his case, though, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee has made wildly inaccurate claims.

In a Fox News interview on Wednesday, Trump said, 鈥淗ard to believe, they have some states passing legislation where you can execute the baby after birth. It鈥檚 crazy.鈥

Facts First: Trump鈥檚 claim is false. No state has passed or is passing a law that allows the execution of a baby after it is born. Killing a person after birth is . 鈥淓very state explicitly criminalizes infanticide,鈥 , a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law, said Thursday. 鈥淭here is no basis for this claim,鈥 , a professor at Rutgers Law School, said Thursday.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a CNN request to specify which states Trump was talking about. Mutcherson said: 鈥淭he falsity of the claim can be seen in the fact that Trump never identifies such a state.鈥

There was at least one instance, in an interview with NBC last year, in which Trump specified that he was making the claim about the state of New York in addition to unspecified 鈥渙ther places.鈥 But he was : New York did not pass a law allowing babies to be killed after birth, though claimed it had.

Similar false claims have circulated about California. Some of those claims were based on criticism of vague language in an early version of a Democratic state legislator鈥檚 2022 that was intended to protect people from being prosecuted over miscarriages, stillbirths and self-managed abortions.

But the vague language was before the bill was signed into law.

Months before passage, a Democratic-led legislative committee that the early text鈥檚 vague use of the phrase 鈥溾 might have inadvertently left open the interpretation that the bill would immunize people from punishment in all cases in which their baby died in the first days of its life, even in cases where the death was caused by acts after the baby was born. The final bill that was signed into law by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom that the 鈥減erinatal death鈥 immunity is specifically for 鈥減erinatal death due to causes that occurred in utero.鈥

In other words, there is no basis for a claim that California passed a law legalizing post-birth executions.

A repeated false claim about legal scholars

Trump appointed three of the Supreme Court justices who voted in 2022 to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had guaranteed abortion rights around the country. During his current presidential campaign, he has repeatedly made the that all legal scholars had wanted Roe v. Wade overturned and power over abortion policy returned to individual states.

Trump said it again in the Fox News interview: 鈥淚 say, let the states decide. This is 鈥 every legal scholar wanted this to be where abortion should be.鈥

Facts FirstTrump鈥檚 claim that 鈥渆very legal scholar鈥 wanted Roe overturned and the power to set abortion policy returned to the states is not even close to true. Many legal scholars wanted Roe preserved, as several of them reiterated in April comments to CNN.

鈥淎ny claim that all legal scholars wanted Roe overturned is mind-numbingly false,鈥 Mutcherson, who supported the preservation of Roe, said in April.

鈥淒onald Trump鈥檚 claim is flatly incorrect,鈥 , an American University law professor who also did not want Roe overturned, said in April.

Trump鈥檚 claim is 鈥渙bviously not鈥 true, said Ziegler, another scholar who did not want Roe overturned. She said in April: 鈥淢ost legal scholars probably track most Americans, who didn鈥檛 want to overturn Roe. 鈥 It wasn鈥檛 as if legal scholars were somehow outliers.鈥

You can read a more detailed fact check of this claim .

CTVNews.ca Top Stories

Two and a half years after losing her best friend and first love to suicide, Brooke Ford shared her story of grief and resilience at the CMHA Windsor-Essex Suicide Awareness Walk.

An Ottawa driver has been charged with stunt driving after being caught going 154 km/h on Highway 417, according to the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP).

opinion

opinion How to make the most out of your TFSA

The Tax-Free Savings Account can be a powerful savings tool and investment vehicle. Financial contributor Christopher Liew explains how they work and how to take full advantage of them so you can reach your financial goals faster.

Local Spotlight

A tale about a taxicab hauling gold and sinking through the ice on Larder Lake, Ont., in December 1937 has captivated a man from that town for decades.

When a group of B.C. filmmakers set out on a small fishing boat near Powell River last week, they hoped to capture some video for a documentary on humpback whales. What happened next blew their minds.

A pizza chain in Edmonton claims to have the world's largest deliverable pizza.

Sarah McLachlan is returning to her hometown of Halifax in November.

Wayne MacKay is still playing basketball twice at Mount Allison University at 87 years old.

A man from a small rural Alberta town is making music that makes people laugh.

An Indigenous artist has a buyer-beware warning ahead of Sept. 30, the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation.

Police are looking to the public for help after thieves broke into a Lethbridge ice creamery, stealing from the store.

An ordinary day on the job delivering mail in East Elmwood quickly turned dramatic for Canada Post letter carrier Jared Plourde. A woman on his route was calling out in distress.

Stay Connected